Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, this patch was marked in CF as "Needs Review" [1], but there has > been no activity on this thread for 7+ months. > If nothing more is planned for this thread then it will be closed > ("Returned with feedback") at the end of this CF.
I still think it would be a good idea, but I can't deny the lack of other interest in it. Unless someone steps up to review, let's close it. (FTR, I don't agree with David's objections to the entire concept of zone abbreviations. We're not going to remove support for them everywhere else, so why shouldn't to_timestamp() handle them?) regards, tom lane