Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 23:57 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> -1 please. We should not break that abstraction for the sake
>> of ignorable warnings on ancient compilers.
> Ignoring the warning was my 1st thought too, because an old discussion I
> found about the warning was too old (2011). The style I adopted in my
> “fix” is used in a few other places too, so I thought I might as well
> go for it.
Oh, well maybe I'm missing some context. What comparable places did
you see?
regards, tom lane
