On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:08:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Well, I'm OK with this consensus on 1d35f705e if folks think this is > useful enough for all the stable branches.
I have done that down to REL_15_STABLE for now as this is able to apply cleanly there. Older branches have a lack of information here, actually, because read_backup_label() does not return the TLI retrieved from the start WAL segment, so we don't have the whole package of information. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
