Hi, On 2018-06-19 14:05:24 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Yeah, I agree that a GUC seems more powerful and easier to roll out. > A downside is that there could be cached plans still using that old > index. If we did DDL on the index we could be sure they all got > invalidated, but otherwise how do we know?
Hm - it doesn't seem too hard to force an invalidation after SIGHUP and certain config changes. Seems like that would be a good idea for other existing GUCs anyway? Greetings, Andres Freund
