On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:27:43PM +0500, Andrey M. Borodin wrote: > Sorry for this long and vague explanation, if it still seems too > uncertain we can have a chat or something like that. I don't think > this number picking stuff deserve to be commented, because it still > is quite close to random. RFC gives us too much freedom of choice.
Speaking about the RFC, I can see that there is a draft but nothing formal yet. The last one I can see is v14 from last November: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-14 It does not strike me as a good idea to rush an implementation without a specification officially approved because there is always a risk of shipping something that's non-compliant into core. But perhaps I am missing something on the RFC side? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
