On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:10:37AM +0500, Andrey M. Borodin wrote: > On 12 Mar 2024, at 10:53, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> On 22 Jan 2024, at 09:22, Nikolay Samokhvalov <n...@postgres.ai> wrote: >> >> And many libraries are already including implementation of UUIDv7 – here are >> some examples: >> >> - https://www.npmjs.com/package/uuidv7 >> - https://crates.io/crates/uuidv7 >> - https://github.com/google/uuid/pull/139 > > So at least reviewing patch and agreeing on chosen methods and constants > makes sense.
Sure, there is no problem in discussing a patch to implement a behavior. But I disagree about taking a risk in merging something that could become non-compliant with the approved RFC, if the draft is approved at the end, of course. This just strikes me as a bad idea. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
