>> I agree with you though supporting MERGE or ON-CONFLICT-DO-UPDATE seems >hard work. >> Only ON-CONCLICT-DO-NOTHING use case may be narrow. > >Is it narrow, or is it just easy enough to add quickly?
Sorry for late replay. I read your comment and rethought about it. What I meant by "narrow" is that the number of people who use this new feature seems limited to me. And I had a wrong impression that small improvements are always rejected by hackers. But that's only the case for small improvements with huge source code modification. In short, cost/benefit ratio is low case. This patch have some benefits with source code change is small. So I just wait for other people reviews. >And by the way, you don't need MERGE. You can just generate INSERT/ >UPDATE/DELETE statements -- MERGE is mainly an optimization on that, and could >wait until PG has a MERGE. Oh, thank you for clarifying this. Now I understand it. Best regards, Takeshi Ideriha
