On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 5:39 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 4/18/24 09:10, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 10:54:56AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote: > >> I've added an open item [1], because what's one open item when you can > >> have two? (me) > > > > And this is still an open item as of today. What's the plan to move > > forward here? > > AFAIK the plan is to replace the asserts with actually resetting the > rs_empty_tuples_pending field to 0, as suggested by Melanie a week ago. > I assume she was busy with the post-freeze AM reworks last week, so this > was on a back burner.
yep, sorry. Also I took a few days off. I'm just catching up today. I want to pop in one of Richard or Tomas' examples as a test, since it seems like it would add some coverage. I will have a patch soon. - Melanie