Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > Perhaps Alvaro and Tom would like to chime in, as committers of > respectively 5de890e3610d and 06286709ee06?
No objection here. In a green field I might argue for
round-to-nearest instead of round-up, but it looks like we
have several precedents for round-up, so let's avoid changing
that existing behavior.
regards, tom lane
