On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 13:23, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > > Perhaps Alvaro and Tom would like to chime in, as committers of > > respectively 5de890e3610d and 06286709ee06? > > No objection here. In a green field I might argue for > round-to-nearest instead of round-up, but it looks like we > have several precedents for round-up, so let's avoid changing > that existing behavior.
Thanks. I've pushed the patch now. David
