Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> writes:
> Yeah, I had a vested interest in this one place because I've been
> reviewing the other thread [1] that was mentioned above. If that other
> thread chooses "true|false" then putting "true|false" adjacent to
> another "on|off" will look silly. But if that other thread adopts the
> existing 'failover=on|off' values then it will diverge even further
> from being consistent with the CREATE SUBSCRIPTION page.
It's intentional that we allow more than one spelling of boolean
values. I can see some value in being consistent within nearby
examples, but I don't agree at all that it should be uniform
across all our docs.
regards, tom lane
