Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2024-May-17, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Anyone else want to vote?

> I had pretty much the same thought as you.  It seems a waste to leave
> the code in existing branches be slow only because we have a much better
> approach for a branch that doesn't even exist yet.

I won't complain too loudly as long as we remember to revert the
patch from HEAD once the ecpg fix goes in.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to