Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2024-May-17, Robert Haas wrote: >> Anyone else want to vote?
> I had pretty much the same thought as you. It seems a waste to leave > the code in existing branches be slow only because we have a much better > approach for a branch that doesn't even exist yet. I won't complain too loudly as long as we remember to revert the patch from HEAD once the ecpg fix goes in. regards, tom lane