On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 4:58 PM John Naylor <johncnaylo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 8:12 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 7:54 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > > > I don't know if there's any reason why the current order > > > is preferable.) > > > > IIUC there is no particular reason for the current order in RT_NODE_48. > > Yeah. I found that simply swapping them enables clang to avoid > double-initialization, but gcc still can't figure it out and must be > told to stop at slot_idxs[]. I'd prefer to do it that way and document > that slot_idxs is purposefully the last member of the fixed part of > the struct.
+1 Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
