On 2018/07/05 23:00, Robert Haas wrote: > With respect to partitioning specifically, it seems like we might be > able to come up with some way of planning that doesn't need a full > relcache entry for every partition, particularly if there are no > partition-local objects (indexes, triggers, etc.). We won't know that there are no partition-local objects until we open them though, right? As you said, there might be a way to refactor things such that just knowing that there are no partition-local objects becomes cheaper than doing a full-fledged RelationBuildDesc.
Thanks, Amit
