On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 9:32 AM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andres has suggested in the past that we allow maintenance_work_mem be
> set to a lower value or introduce some kind of development GUC so that
> we can more easily test multiple pass index vacuuming. Do you think
> this would be worth it?

No, I don't.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


Reply via email to