On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 9:32 AM Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote: > Andres has suggested in the past that we allow maintenance_work_mem be > set to a lower value or introduce some kind of development GUC so that > we can more easily test multiple pass index vacuuming. Do you think > this would be worth it?
No, I don't. -- Peter Geoghegan