On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 2:13 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > It's hard by now (i.e. 17+) because you need substantial amounts of rows to be > able to trigger it which makes it a hard fight to introduce.
I didn't think that it was particularly hard when I tested the test that Melanie committed. > And the cost of > setting the GUC limit lower is essentially zero. Apparently you know more about TID Store than me. If it really is trivial to lower the limit, then I have no objections to doing so. That would make it easy to fix the test flappiness issues by just using the much lower limit. -- Peter Geoghegan
