jian he <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 10:17 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> AFAICS, that one is correct, so I left it alone. (I didn't try to
>> merge the table's two entries into one like that, though.)
> regexp_replace(string, pattern, replacement [, start [, N ]] [, flags ]).
> can represent
> regexp_replace(string, pattern, replacement , start, flags ) ?
Hmm, yeah, you're right. I didn't want to write two separate
synopses there, but maybe there's no choice.
regards, tom lane
