v7-0001-vaccum_delay-with-absolute-time-nanosleep.patch
Description: Binary data
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 06:00:53AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: >> + SleepEx((microsec < 500 ? 1 : (microsec + 500) / 1000), FALSE); > > I think this deserves a comment. >
Done >> +#define INSTR_TIME_ADD_MICROSEC(x,t) \ >> + ((x).ticks += t * NS_PER_US) > > I'd add parentheses around "t" to ensure any expressions given as "t" are > evaluated first. > Done > Also, do we need to worry about overflow here? It looks like the rest of > instr_time.h is oblivious about overflow, so maybe this is better discussed > in a separate thread... > I agree, this needs to be handled in a different thread. Please see v7. Regards, Sami
