Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> I'm a bit surprised that you decided to push to the 11 branch - the
>> consensus in this thread seem to have gone the other way by my read?
>> Given that that's the rule, and pushing non-fixes is the exception, I'm
>> not particularly ok with just ignoring that?
> +1
By my count of people expressing opinions, we had Michael -1, Stephen -1,
me -0.1 or so, Alvaro +1, Peter -1, presumably +1 from Andrew; and Andres
made a comment about not waiting, which perhaps Andrew read as a +1 for
backpatching. So it's not unreasonable for Andrew to have decided that
it was about tied. Nonetheless, it does seem like a feature and we're
past feature freeze, so the default assumption ought to be "no backpatch"
IMO.
regards, tom lane
