On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > By my count of people expressing opinions, we had Michael -1, Stephen -1, > me -0.1 or so, Alvaro +1, Peter -1, presumably +1 from Andrew; and Andres > made a comment about not waiting, which perhaps Andrew read as a +1 for > backpatching. So it's not unreasonable for Andrew to have decided that > it was about tied. Nonetheless, it does seem like a feature and we're > past feature freeze, so the default assumption ought to be "no backpatch" > IMO.
Yeah, I would have voted -1 if I'd realized that it was close. Now we're in a situation where we have patch not everyone likes not only in master (which is OK, because we've got a year to decide whether to change anything) but also in v11 (where we have a lot less time). That's not so great. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
