Dear Fujii-san, > +1 to focusing on the 0001 patch. > > Since this isn't a bug fix, I'm not sure back-patching is strictly necessary. > That said, it does improve consistency and test coverage, e.g., by adding > checks > like help text length, so I'd be fine with back-patching if others see value > in it.
Initially I thought this was helpful even for back branches, but it is not 100% needed. No objections even if it is only applied to master - it can check new features in future. Best regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED