On Thu, 2025-06-19 at 05:03 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> Late to the party, but is there an argument for porting this to the
> citext type? Or supplementing the extension with an additional type
> ("cftext"? *shrug*).
CASEFOLD() addresses a lot of the problems with using LOWER(), so that
sounds like a good idea. I'd be interested to hear from users of
citext.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
