On 19.06.25 06:03, Thom Brown wrote:
Late to the party, but is there an argument for porting this to the citext type? Or supplementing the extension with an additional type ("cftext"? *shrug*). It currently uses lower(), so our current recommendation for dealing with all unicode characters is to use nondeterministic collations.
What is the motivation for wanting a citext variant instead of using nondeterministic collations?
