>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> The patch in the original email is in text/plain with base64 transfer >> encoding, which means that CRLF line endings are mandatory. It's >> actually up to the receiving MUA (or the archives webserver) to undo >> that. >> >> If the archives webserver isn't handling that then it's a bug there. Andrew> Probably a good reason not to use text/plain for patches, ISTM. Andrew> I do note that my MUA (Thunderbird) uses text/x-patch and Andrew> probably violates RFC2046 4.1.1 The first patch of yours I found was in text/x-patch with 7bit transfer encoding, so the line endings are actually those of the mail message itself (i.e. CRLF on the wire). -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
