> On 2 Jul 2025, at 06:31, Robert Treat <r...@xzilla.net> wrote: > FWIW, I tend to agree with David; I feel like if a user passes in -U, > there was probably a reason, and a good error message would be more > useful in clarifying things rather than blindly pushing forward with > potentially the wrong thing.
Agreed, and it's not even clear that the previous code was intentionally trying to allow an empty -U. An improved error message would be a good patch though. -- Daniel Gustafsson
