> On 2 Jul 2025, at 15:52, Jianghua Yang <yjhj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi hackers,
> 
> Based on the suggestion that we should explicitly reject empty usernames 
> instead of silently falling back, I’ve updated the patch accordingly.
> 
> ### Changes in v2:
> 
> - `initdb` now errors out immediately if the `-U` or `--username` argument is 
> an empty string.
> - The error message is:
>   
>       superuser name must not be empty
> 
> - A regression test is added to `src/bin/initdb/t/001_initdb.pl` to verify 
> that the case `initdb -U ''` fails as expected.
> 
> This approach avoids any ambiguity about whether an empty username is valid, 
> and fails early with a clear message. It also brings consistency with 
> existing checks, such as the one disallowing superuser names starting with 
> `pg_`.
> 
> Let me know if this looks acceptable or if further refinement is needed.

+       pg_log_error("superuser name must not be empty");
+       exit(1);

I would prefer pg_fatal() for this.

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Reply via email to