Hi all,

I recently hit an error with our streaming replication setup:

  2025-07-14 11:52:59.361 
CST,"replicator","",728458,"10.9.9.74:35724",68747f1b.b1d8a,1,"START_REPLICATION",2025-07-14
 11:52:59 CST,3/0,0,ERROR,58P01,"requested WAL segment 00000001000000000000000C 
has already been removed",,,,,,"START_REPLICATION 0/C000000 TIMELINE 
1",,,"standby","walsender",,0

It appears the requested WAL segment 00000001000000000000000C had already been
archived, and I confirmed its presence in the archive directory. However, when
the standby tried to request this file, the primary only searched for it in
pg_wal and didn't check the archive directory. I had to manually copy the
segment into pg_wal to get streaming replication working again.

My question is: Can we make the primary automatically search the archive if
restore_command is set?

I found that Fujii Masao also requested this feature [1], but it seems there
wasn't a consensus.

I've attached a script to reproduce this issue.

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTinN%3DxsPOoaXzVFSp1OkfMDAB1f_d-F91xjEZDV8%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
Regards,
Japin Li

#!/bin/bash

rm -rf /tmp/pgdata{1,2} /tmp/archive{1,2}

mkdir -p /tmp/archive{1,2}

initdb -k /tmp/pgdata1
cat <<EOF >>/tmp/pgdata1/postgresql.auto.conf
listen_addresses = 'localhost'
port = '9967'
archive_mode = 'on'
archive_command = 'cp %p /tmp/archive1/%f'
restore_command = 'cp /tmp/archive1/%f %p'
EOF

pg_ctl -l 1.log -D /tmp/pgdata1 start

pg_basebackup -h localhost -p 9967 -R -Fp -Xs -P -D /tmp/pgdata2

cat <<EOF >>/tmp/pgdata2/postgresql.auto.conf
port = '9968'
archive_command = 'cp %p /tmp/archive2/%f'
restore_command = 'cp /tmp/archive2/%f %p'
EOF

pg_ctl -l 2.log -D /tmp/pgdata2 start

psql postgres -p 9967 -xc 'SELECT * FROM pg_stat_replication'

pgbench -i -s 10 -h localhost -p 9967 postgres

pg_ctl -l 2.log -D /tmp/pgdata2 stop
pg_ctl -l 1.log -D /tmp/pgdata1 stop
pg_ctl -l 1.log -D /tmp/pgdata1 start
pg_ctl -l 2.log -D /tmp/pgdata2 start

psql postgres -p 9967 -xc 'SELECT * FROM pg_stat_replication'

Reply via email to