On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 at 10:08, Japin Li <japi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I recently hit an error with our streaming replication setup: > > 2025-07-14 11:52:59.361 > CST,"replicator","",728458,"10.9.9.74:35724",68747f1b.b1d8a,1,"START_REPLICATION",2025-07-14 > 11:52:59 CST,3/0,0,ERROR,58P01,"requested WAL segment > 00000001000000000000000C has already been removed",,,,,,"START_REPLICATION > 0/C000000 TIMELINE 1",,,"standby","walsender",,0 > > My question is: Can we make the primary automatically search the archive if > restore_command is set?
If we talk about physical replication, then with the same success restore_command could be (and more important, it should be) used on a standby. And the main question here is why standby wasn't properly configured? However, with logical replication it is a different story, and it would be really great if restore_command is used when WAL's are missing to fetch it. Regards, -- Alexander Kukushkin
