On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 12:02:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 12:21:32AM -0700, Lukas Fittl wrote: >> FWIW, I looked again at the MinGW sources and I think you're right that >> intrin.h is likely also correct for MinGW. I originally thought that >> cpuid.h would be correct, given that's whats used by GCC/clang, but I think >> the MinGW source itself is authoritative here (vs the compiler in use), and >> that has a intrin.h include ([0]) but no cpuid.h. > > Yeah. I have a close of MinGW locally, and that matches what I saw.
s/close/clone/. > Applied on all the branches. Let's wait for the buildfarm to report, > now. The first reports are popping up for the Windows animals, and as far as I can see things seem to tbe OK for now in terms of the flavors of __cpuid & friends detected, for the mix of meson, MinGW, MSVC and configure that we have. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
