On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 11:33 AM Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, it's pretty inefficient. (For comparison, it runs in about two > seconds on my machine, so I hadn't noticed how bad it had gotten. > Thanks for pointing it out.)
Interesting. Are you on Linux? I'm testing directly on macOS, and I wonder now whether macOS is comparatively slower at starting new processes... -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
