On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 9:26 AM Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote: > If it's truly just a few lines, then I've misunderstood what you're > suggesting (patches welcome). It's not the separator splitting that > I'm worried about, but the restructuring of the test.
Here is a very slapdash attempt at pushing the "chunk size iteration" part of the tests down into the test executable, using null separators. I think it's ugly, but maybe not quite as bad as I feared. Unfortunately it only gives about a 4x speedup on my machine, and I was hoping for much more. (We should really expect this entire thing to run in a fraction of a second.) Let me know if you think the tradeoff is worth it for now; I can polish it up if so. Thanks, --Jacob
0001-WIP-try-adding-chunk-ranges.patch
Description: Binary data
