> On 2 Oct 2025, at 23:00, David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 at 01:33, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Another nitpick would be to remove the test for NULL in >> test_bms_make_singleton >> since that is a STRICT function, making the test for NULL superfluous code: > > I didn't notice that was marked as strict. It would be good to get rid > of those lines in that case.
Done, comment cleanup and nullness check pushed. -- Daniel Gustafsson
