On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 2:49 PM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the second item fits better with the current thread's subject. > Having said that, these two items are somewhat related (for example, > adding getrandom() support would be a common change for both), so > perhaps we can start with the pg_strong_random() changes in this > thread?
Sounds good. --Jacob
