On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 9:05 PM Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > As Ashutosh suggests I will go more for the backpatching approach because > > the synchronized_standby_slots parameter impacts the last 2 major versions > > and this problem is critical on production environments. > > > > Fair enough. Let's wait for the related issue being discussed in email > [1] to be fixed. >
As the other patch is committed (f33e60a53a9ca89b5078df49416acae20affe1f5), can you update and prepare backbranch patches for this fix as well? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
