On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 10:56 AM Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 10:10 AM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > +1 for hard-coding the supported encoding list. I think it's a good
> > start point. We can revisit the idea of dynamically constructing the
> > encoding list if we're concerned about its maintenance cost.
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao
>

Thanks everyone for reviewing my proposal.
I've hard-coded the valid list of encoding names.

Also, I modified the hint string into like "Valid encodings are \"hex\",
\"base64\", \"base64url\", and \"escape\"."
by adding "and" before "escape".

I attached my v2 patch to this message. Please let me know freely if you
have any additional questions.

Regards,

Attachment: v2-0001-Added-error-hints-for-invalid-binary-encoding-names-.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to