On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 5:34 AM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:44 AM Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 04:04:17PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > > Oh right, I had forgotten about that, thanks for the reminder. The patch > > > as > > > proposed is correct then. > > > > The patch is probably fine as-is, but this seems like a candidate for the > > ClosestMatch stuff added by commit 5ac51c8. > > +1
Is there a guideline on when we should use the ClosestMatch machinery instead of explicitly listing valid values? From the discussion in [1], it seems appropriate when there are many possible values. But should we generally replace all hints that list valid values with ClosestMatch, or only in specific cases? Regards, [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected] -- Fujii Masao
