Hi ChangAo, At 2025-11-23 13:31:49, "cca5507" <[email protected]> wrote: >> The patch in attachment is better for me. What do you think? > >The v2-0001 LGTM. > >A small suggestion: > >We should move the 'break' out of the 'if', because we don't want it fall >through to XLOG_HEAP2_REWRITE if we are fast-forwarding.
Fair. The patch updated is provided in attachment. Best regards, Haiyang Li
v3-0001-Handle-XLOG_HEAP2_NEW_CID-in-fast-forward.patch
Description: Binary data
