Thanks for the new patch. On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 04:12:02PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote: > I went back-forth on if it makes sense to provide the name as an > extra argument and decided it provides more flexibility. For example > I can use the same init callback and arguments for different segments.
If the initialization callback function needed the name, it could be provided via the "void *" callback argument, right? I'm not following why we need to provide it separately. -- nathan
