> On a slightly related topic, I mentioned earlier that I found 3 > extensions using GetNamedDSMSegment. One of them, > pg_track_optimizer[1] could use the new GetNamedDSHash function, > except that it doesn't provide a callback similar to what we have in > c, and it relies on initializing the hash in the > callback, before it returns. That's not possible with the new > function. > > What do you think, would it make sense to also include callbacks for > GetNamedDSHash and GetNamedDSA? > > [1]: https://github.com/danolivo/pg_track_optimizer/
GetNamedDSA and GetNamedDSHash do not have a need for a callback, because there isn't custom initialization logic that can be applied there. -- Sami Imseih Amazon Web Services (AWS)
