On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 3:58 PM Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru>
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:40 PM Alexander Korotkov
> <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:28 PM amul sul <sula...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018, 6:35 PM Alexander Korotkov <
> a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:10 PM amul sul <sula...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:05 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > >> > <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > >> > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:22 AM David G. Johnston
> > >> > > <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > From those results the question is how important is it to force
> the following breakage on our users (i.e., introduce FX exact symbol
> matching):
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > SELECT to_timestamp('97/Feb/16', 'FXYY:Mon:DD');
> > >> > > > - to_timestamp
> > >> > > > -------------------------------
> > >> > > > - Sun Feb 16 00:00:00 1997 PST
> > >> > > > -(1 row)
> > >> > > > -
> > >> > > > +ERROR: unexpected character "/", expected character ":"
> > >> > > > +HINT: In FX mode, punctuation in the input string must
> exactly match the format string.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > There seemed to be some implicit approvals of this breakage
> some 30 emails and 10 months ago but given that this is the only change
> from a correct result to a failure I'd like to officially put it out there
> for opinion/vote gathering. Mine is a -1; though keeping the distinction
> between space and non-alphanumeric characters is expected.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Do I understand correctly that you're -1 to changes to FX mode,
> but no
> > >> > > objection to changes in non-FX mode?
> > >> > >
> > >> > Ditto.
> > >>
> > >> So, if no objections for non-FX mode changes, then I'll extract that
> > >> part and commit it separately.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, that make sense to me, thank you.
> >
> > OK! I've removed FX changes from the patch. The result is attached.
> > I'm going to commit this if no objections.
>
> Attached revision fixes usage of two subsequent spaces in the
> documentation.
>
So, pushed! Thanks to every thread participant for review and feedback.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
