On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 11:11 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: > > What's also puzzling is that what this test is doing seems to be > > totally standard. > > Yeah. I do notice something interesting when running it here: > 046_checkpoint_logical_slot_mike.log shows that we are triggering > quite a few checkpoints (via pg_switch_wal()) in quick succession > on the primary. I wonder if that is somehow tickling a Windows > filesystem restriction.
Maybe, but it seems unlikely to me that this would mess up the standby, since it's a totally different node. What I kind of wonder is if somehow there's still a process that has backup_label open, or has closed it but not recently enough for Windows to unlock it. However, I don't see why that would affect this test case and not others. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
