On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:17 AM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is not clear to me either why the similar test like > 040_standby_failover_slots_sync is successful and > 046_checkpoint_logical_slot is failing. I am still thinking about it > but thought of sharing the information I could gather by debugging. >
It seems there is some interaction with previous test in same file which is causing this failure as we are using the primary node from previous test. When I tried to comment out get_changes and its corresponding injection_point in the previous test as attached, the entire test passed. I think if we use a freshly created primary node, this test will pass but I wanted to spend some more time to see how/why previous test is causing this issue? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
comment_logical_slot_1.patch
Description: Binary data
