On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 9:37 AM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 8:02 AM Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ~~~ > > > > EXCEPT: > > > > 3. > > <varlistentry id="sql-createpublication-params-for-except-table"> > > - <term><literal>EXCEPT TABLE</literal></term> > > + <term><literal>EXCEPT</literal></term> > > <listitem> > > > > The 'EXCEPT' clause is not really at the same level as all the other > > ones, because it can only be applied to the FOR ALL TABLES. So, I felt > > maybe 'EXCEPT' might make more sense as a sublist entry under the FOR > > ALL TABLES clause. > > > > Possible but in future it would be applicable for all the three > variants listed above: FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA, FOR ALL TABLES, FOR ALL > SEQUENCES. So, don't think making it as a sublist for "FOR ALL TABLE" > is a good idea. I find keeping it at its current place okay as it is > also an independent clause.
Keeping it independent makes sense, as it will allow for easier future expansion. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar Google
