Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> writes:
> On 16/04/2026 17:37, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not excited about making massive changes for this.
> Having all three would be a very localized change in postgres.h.
Sure, but *using* them in a consistent way would be invasive.
>> I remain far less certain than Peter is that this discussion has
>> anything to do with why Coverity is complaining about
>> ginExtractEntries. I still think we should make some minimum-effort
>> change to see if the complaint goes away before expending a lot of
>> brain cells on choosing a final fix.
> I think I'm going to commit my proposal to turn PointerGetDatum() back
> into a macro, and see if that makes Coverity happy. Then we'll know, and
> we can decide on the next steps. Any objections?
WFM.
regards, tom lane
