On 28.04.26 22:32, Nathan Bossart wrote:
Here's a full set of patches for back-patching purposes.
protocol_openssl.c has a similar problem on older versions.  I suppose this
is the sort of thing I could back-patch all the way to v9.2.  Does anyone
feel strongly one way or the other about that?

Why should this be backpatched at all?



Reply via email to