Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
> On 28.04.26 22:32, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Here's a full set of patches for back-patching purposes.
>> protocol_openssl.c has a similar problem on older versions. I suppose this
>> is the sort of thing I could back-patch all the way to v9.2. Does anyone
>> feel strongly one way or the other about that?
> Why should this be backpatched at all?
To silence those warnings. If you're using a Mac for development,
they're pretty annoying. And we have generally had a policy of
trying to silence warnings in still-interesting branches.
regards, tom lane
