On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 04:42:45PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2026-May-15, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> Yeah, this may be the best option. I'm curious what others think. > > I think this bug makes it clear that this code has few enough users, and > a sufficient number of bugs, that we should just nuke it. Do you really > want to spend so much time trying to fix it? The module's documentation > says > > (This functionality is long since superseded by the built-in foreign > key mechanism, of course, but the module is still useful as an example.) > > but I question whether the usefulness value is really there. > > Would anyone oppose that?
Big +1 for removing it in v20. Or maybe even v19. I do think it is worth trying to fix the more egregious bugs, though, as the code will still be supported for a few years. -- nathan
