On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 8:00 PM shveta malik <[email protected]> wrote: > pg_copy_physical_replication_slot() should not have it as the common > 'copy_replication_slot' is already fixed in the patch.
copy_replication_slot() calls create_physical_replication_slot() before entering the PG_TRY/PG_CATCH block. So if create_physical_replication_slot() throws an error, wouldn't the same issue still occur? > I will review > the others. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao
