Thank you for the new version. At Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:47:27 -0500, Baji Shaik <[email protected]> wrote in > I prefer keeping them as 3 patches since each addresses a distinct > failure mode and is easier to review/bisect independently. That said, > since 0002 and 0003 now share the same errdetail and are logically > the same validation (timestamp outside valid range), I'm happy to > merge them into one patch for v4 if preferred.
Personally, I still feel that providing the UUIDv7 timestamp domain in an errdetail is a bit excessive. Even for infinity, I tend to think of the issue as simply being outside the representable range, so I'm not sure that a separate message is necessary. That said, this feels like a matter of taste, so it would probably be useful to hear other opinions. Regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
