On Fri, Jul 3, 2026 at 2:54 PM Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]> wrote:
> There's no overflow anymore with the current patch, so that comment is > somewhat stale. Maybe it could be simply "large future intervals are > rejected"? > Thanks Zsolt! Good catch. Updated the test comment in v5 attached. Thanks, Baji Shaik
v5-0002-Reject-out-of-range-timestamps-in-uuidv7-interval.patch
Description: Binary data
v5-0001-Reject-infinite-intervals-in-uuidv7-interval.patch
Description: Binary data
